December 2008

Keeping Values of Probate Assets Private

by Boyd Johnson on December 24, 2008

In follow-up to yesterday’s post, sometimes you don’t want “the public” (i.e. speculators and busy-bodies) to know the exact value of real estate or other assets in the probate. Here’s a couple of ways to keep the values private:

  1. The initial Petition or Application to open the probate merely requires estimated values to be given. Typically, you haven’t yet appraised property at this point. The point of listing the estimated values of the probate and non-probate assets is so that the probate court can determine whether the estate is insolvent or not. An acceptable estimate could be something like “$100,000+” for a value. The figure you provide should be balanced with the requisite duties of candor to the court.
  2. While the Inventory requires exact values at the time of death (estimates will not do), the Inventory may not need to be filed. There are a variety of factors that determine whether the Inventory must be/should be filed (e.g. local practice, the type of proceeding, the identity of the interested parties, etc.) Note the important word “or” in 524.3-706 (“a personal representative…shall prepare and file or mail an inventory…) This statute provides at least the possibility that you do not need to file the Inventory. But again, other factors should be weighed.

The information above does not constitute legal advice. Please see our disclaimer.

Categorized in Practice Tips and tagged as , , , ,

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Is There Real Estate in Your Probate? Expect Junk Mail

by Boyd Johnson on December 23, 2008

Give your personal representative a heads-up if there is real estate listed as probate property in your probate petition. Given the current real estate market conditions, speculators are as ravenous as ever to snatch up property at a discount. Tell the personal representative to expect lots of junk mail from the speculators and to check with you before going too far in a deal with these speculators.

I had one personal representative who received several pieces of mail a week for a while. Judging from the letterhead and content of the speculators’ letters, most of them seemed dubious at best. Proceed with an abundance of caution and provide preventative counsel to your client before it becomes a problem.

Categorized in Practice Tips and tagged as , ,

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Minnesota Estate Tax: New Assembly Instructions

December 22, 2008

If you are preparing an M706 this year, be aware that there are new assembly instructions for attachments in the 2008 M706 Instructions. The preferred method of submission of attachments is to “use binder clips, 3-ring binders or 2-prong fasteners. Do not use bindings, staples, or colored paper as separators” (emphasis in original). That last [...]

Read the full article →

Hennepin County: Filing Fees and Copy Requests

December 15, 2008

There have been quite a number of procedural changes to probates in Hennepin County in recent months. The Registrars have issued another change today. Separate checks are now required for filing fees and copy requests. Additionally, the checks will likely need to be sent at separate times. Previously, many attorneys sent in one check for [...]

Read the full article →

Enhanced FDIC Protection for Trust Accounts

December 10, 2008

The Wills, Trusts & Estates Prof Blog references an article explaining how revocable trust accounts have more protection under the new FDIC rules. However, the protection is capped at $250,000 per beneficiary and expires in 2010, returning to the previous $100,000 level. In these days of bank failures, understanding the basics of the FDIC rules [...]

Read the full article →

Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel: Hennepin County

December 8, 2008

Metro-county probate courts often have extra, unwritten rules that you must comply with in order to proceed. I discovered one on Friday that I didn’t know about. To withdrawal as counsel in Hennepin County under Rule 105, you must provide notice to all interested parties. This goes beyond Rule 105 which merely requires that you [...]

Read the full article →

The Personal Representative’s Powers Relate Back Before Appointment

December 5, 2008

Can a nominated personal representative perform acts on behalf of the estate prior to his appointment? Under Minnesota Stat. 524.3-701, the answer is yes, but it carries risk. The statute states that the powers of a personal representative “relate back in time to give acts [performed] by the person appointed. . . the same effect [...]

Read the full article →

Hennepin County Probate: More Procedure Changes

December 3, 2008

As a result of the recent changes in Hennepin County to the procedure to publish the probate notice, the Registrars will no longer allow you to mail the notices to the interested parties from their office (source: Registrar’s Office email). This had been a convenient option that enabled the attorney to quickly have the letters [...]

Read the full article →