Small is now bigger, but dangers abound: Changes to Affidavit for Collection of Personal Property

by Boyd Johnson on May 26, 2009

“Small” is now bigger thanks to Governor Pawlenty’s approval of H.F. 265. The new law makes changes to Minnesota’s probate code.

Among other things, the bill revised Minn. Stat. 524.3-1201, the procedure for collecting personal property of a decedent by affidavit. Changes to this statute include:

  • The asset limit increases from $20,000 to $50,000.
  • The successor no longer has to present the affidavit in duplicate (once upon a time there were no photocopiers).

It appears that the law will be effective August 1, 2009. The statute itself does not limit the application of this procedure to those dying after August 1st, so presumably it will be “retroactive” in the sense that it could transfer property to the successor even if the decedent died prior to the effective date.

The obvious advantage of the increase to the asset limit is that more “small estates” will avoid probate.

However, with the increase in the asset limit, more problems will occur. For example:

  • Creditors will have a more difficult time asserting claims against the estate and collecting on their bills since the procedural protections present with probates (e.g. filing claims statements, demanding notice, requesting bond, etc.) do not exist with the affidavit procedure.
  • Successors will distribute the property improperly (both intentionally or unintentionally), creating inequalities in the distribution. Among dishonest and feuding family members, this will result in a race to get an affidavit to claim the property and gain control over the assets.
  • Successors will distribute the property prior to paying lawful claims against the estate and will face liability from creditors or will ignore superior claims, such as exempt property under 524.2-403.
  • Attorneys will need to increase the amount of “educating” they do for potential clients who think they “just need a form” to get the assets. “The form” cannot transfer real property.

Finally, expect the unauthorized practice of law to increase. I’ve heard of certain enterprising and devious financial planners preparing these affidavits for family members of deceased clients. They, of course, have self-interested benefits in doing so. By helping them obtain the assets “without the high cost of getting an attorney involved,” they can also “help them invest the assets.”

As always, successors will do well to obtain competent legal counsel prior to taking action. Though the procedure seems simple at first glance, there are many pitfalls in using the procedure.

Categorized in In the News,Practice Tips and tagged as , , ,

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: